Food For Thought

Posted byHeather CongrovePosted inRamblings and Whispers of TruthTags:, , , , , , , , , ,

I like concepts that get my wheel turning. I like off the wall, random theories that sound so accurate they are a little scary. My beloved husband sent me this video and it consumed my attention for a moment. What do you think, could we be off by 1000 years? I apologize in advance for the Facebook link. I could not find the video on any other platform.

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/16RLWN4Roo/

Discover more from HC Content

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Published by Heather Congrove

Words are my playground, and stories are my passion. As a writer, I weave tales that transport, transform, and transcend. Join me on this journey into the world of words, where imagination knows no bounds, and the possibilities are endless. If you enjoy reading, like and subscribe to see my latest content. Thank you for visiting and God Bless.

11 thoughts on “Food For Thought”

  2. 🌀 The 

    Chrono-Censorship Hypothesis

    Imagine a scenario where time isn’t a linear progression but a malleable construct, susceptible to manipulation. In this framework, a highly advanced civilization—or perhaps an AI with a directive to maintain societal equilibrium—has the capability to edit our perception of history. Whenever events occur that could destabilize society or challenge the prevailing narrative, this entity retroactively alters records, memories, and even physical evidence to erase or modify these occurrences.

    This isn’t just about changing digital records; it’s a comprehensive overhaul of collective memory and tangible artifacts. Think of it as a form of “chrono-censorship,” where the past is continuously rewritten to serve the needs of the present.

    Indicators of such manipulation might include:

    • Anomalous Artifacts: Discoveries like the Antikythera mechanism, an ancient Greek device that functions as an analog computer, seem out of place for their time, suggesting remnants of altered timelines.
    • Mandela Effects: Collective false memories, such as misremembering the spelling of the Berenstain Bears or the number of U.S. states, could be glitches from previous versions of history.
    • Unexplained Technological Leaps: Sudden advancements without clear developmental precursors might hint at reintroduced knowledge from erased timelines.

    If this hypothesis holds, our understanding of history is not just incomplete but intentionally curated. The true chronology of human events could be vastly different from what we perceive, meticulously edited to maintain a specific societal trajectory.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

  3. As a history buff, I am highly skeptical about this. This ruse would entail, for example, the necessity to fabricate histories of China or India. One could point out to the so called ‘Dark Ages’, the period between the 5th and 10th centuries, but these took mere 500 years and, in addition, were not completely dark.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

    1. Good point. I am not a history buff but I know I cannot trust anything the government tells us and most systems are designed to mislead and influence. Therefore no matter how off the wall and crazy it may sound I try to consider all ideas for a moment. But yes, I agree. I do not think this particular theory is accurate.

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply

      1. My Grandpa kept saying: “Trust God, but scrutinize all others”, including politicians.
        Sidenoye: As for me, I’ve subscribed to a solid newspaper with quality investigative journalism – they do it for me.

        Liked by 1 person

      3. I was told, that ‘Washington Post’ might come close to that.
        In any case, avoid free-of-charge news outlets, only newspapers paid exclusively by their readers have a chance to stay independent.

        Liked by 1 person

      4. I will check them out and keep your advice in mind as I search for a reliable news source. Have you heard of “The Pour Over” , it is a Christian based news outlet that covers world wide and US. I see their name often and have wondered how dependable they are.

        Liked by 1 person

      5. I made some research and they seem quite reliable. In any case, I wouldn’t rely on a single information source, or several sources within the same revenue pot.
        If I were you, I would give them a try.

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to chameleon15026052 Cancel reply